Good news, bad news

Let’s start with the bad.

Yes, that’s right. It is Friday and the proposal is not done. But come on, did you really think it would be?

If so, thank you for the vote of confidence.

But let’s move on to the good news. Today was a fruitful, fabulous day. This thing is GOOD, if I do say so myself. The more I work on it, the more I love it. Before I gush any more, let’s recap what the proposal consists of for those of you following along at home.

Essentially, the proposal is the first three chapters of your dissertation. It includes your title, the problem you’re investigating and the research questions you’re trying to answer, a review of the literature (theories and current research pertinent to your topic), and a description of your research design (participants, site, etc.). How detailed you get within these section varies, usually depending on who your advisor is, but for me, this blessed document will be anywhere between 75 and 100+ pages.

So, that’s what I need to pull together, and I do have all of these sections accounted for, just in varying degrees of completeness and in various documents. My topic is one I’ve been studying and writing about since I started at BC, so some of this is a matter of culling the best of it together into one cohesive piece. Right now, the following pieces are COMPLETE: the title (which is a big deal if you know me), the problem and research questions, and the research design. It is 35 pages of goodness. What I need to do next is read through my 50+ page review of the literature and revise it and merge it with my 4 page theoretical framework.

This won’t be a easy task, but it’s doable.

And it will be done before my “vacation” ends.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Good news, bad news

    • phdpes says:

      The current title is: “Building a Brotherhood? A Teacher Researcher’s Study of the Construction of Gender at an All-Boys Catholic Secondary School.”

      This was changed from my previous title, “Burying the ‘dead White guys’: Using the language arts curriculum to promote gender equity and social justice.”

      I like my original one better because I think it’s edgier, catchier, and more radical, but that title does not really capture what I think I am going to do. Plus, from a practical standpoint, you want certain search terms in your title so it comes up when others are looking to read work similar to yours. For instance, nothing in the original title shows this work is at a single-sex school, a Catholic school, a secondary school, or that it is a teacher research study, and these are all of the main components of my work.

      Also, the original title suggests that I have something against dead White guys, and I really don’t. After all, Dad is one… 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s